Reason behind of “Gone With the Wind” Temporarily Removed From HBO Max
As in the Civil War monuments across the country, one such film was done. Gone with the Wind is one of history’s most popular films — but its slavery, racist stereotypes and its unholy portrayal of other older aspects of its story make it toxic to stand alone.
It was the determination of HBO Max, who removed the film from its streaming service Tuesday night amid protests of racial injustice in the United States, sparked by the murder of George Floyd below the knee of a Minneapolis police officer. His demise led to widespread protests and prolonged misunderstandings in all corners of the culture.
The film won’t go away forever, though. It will return with new material, framing its shortcomings in historical context.
Decision may come tomorrow on the IPL T20 World Cup, the future of IPL rests on this!
HBO Max said in a statement, “The Wind with the Wind is a product of its time and features some ethnic and racial prejudices that are, unfortunately, common in American society.” , And we felt that it would be irresponsible to retain this title without explanation and censure of those statements. These depictions are definitely a counter to WarnerMedia’s values. ”
No main cast of the film is still alive, except for Olivia de Havilland, who is 103 years old and has withdrawn from public life in recent years.
During and before the Civil War, based on Margaret Mitchell’s 1936 novel about life on the Atlanta plantation, Gone with the Wind remains the highest-grossing film in history when the box office is adjusted for inflation. In today’s dollars, ticket sales would have totaled $ 3.7 billion, ahead of the 2009 incarnation of $ 3.2 billion. Its popularity has waned for decades due to its extensive romance, epic scenes, and emotional performances, even as its portrayal of slaves and its views about their service have been increasingly troubled.
It cost my father a year’s salary for a ticket to America: Sundar Pichai
The decision to remove the film from HBO Max came 12 years later when John Slidely, a Slave screenwriter who won the Best Adapted Screenplay Oscar for his work on Best Picture-winner, wrote a column in the Los Angeles Times stating that it was released Should not be shown. The headline reads: “Hey, HBO, Gone with the Wind reveals the horrors of slavery. Take it off your stage for now.”
Ridley admitted that many films go bad as social norms change. “Gone with the Wind, however, has its own unique problem. It’s not just ‘low’ in terms of representation. It’s a film that glorifies the Antebellum South. It’s a film that is not unheard of when The horrors of slavery stop only to end some of the most painful stereotypes of people of color, “he wrote.
He said that the 81-year-old film today realistically legitimizes the Confederacy and legitimizes the notion that secession from the Union was a good reason to preserve slave ownership: “It continues to give cover to those falsely claiming Sticking to the iconography of the plantation era is ‘a matter of heritage, not of hatred’.
Ridley did not ask for the film to be removed forever, as Disney has done with the same disturbing song as the South. “Let me be real clear: I don’t believe in censorship. I don’t think Gone with the Wind should be reestablished in a vault in Burbank. All I would like to ask is, after a respectable amount has passed, that Film. Can be reintroduced on the HBO Max platform, “Ridley said, adding that it should be combined with films that more accurately portray the slave era, or are placed in the context that the film’s harmful Aspects to be accepted.
This is exactly what WarnerMedia has said.
“When we return the film to HBO Max, it will return with a discussion of its historical context and a condemnation of those very depictions, but it was originally made, as it would otherwise be, to claim these prejudices. Never existed, “the company said in its statement.” If we are building a more equitable, equitable and inclusive future, we must first accept and understand our history. ”
Ironically, the film was responsible for counting progress in Hollywood at the time, with Hattie McDaniel, who played the slave Mamie, winning the Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress – the first Oscar to go to an African-American. She was also nominated for the first time.
The next black actor to be nominated would receive ten years later, Ethel Waters for the film Pinky, and the next victory 24 years after McDaniel’s victory, with Sydney Poitier claiming Best Actor for the 1963 Lilies of the Field.
